The examples given for "group(s)" show other differences from the use of 'bunch/lot' , etc. This indigenous people was subjugated by invaders from afar. Alejandro Valverde, who is taking part for the first time in the Santos Tour Down Under which started yesterday in the locality of Clare and will finish next Sunday February 24 in the south Australian city of Adelaide, finished the second stage between Gawler, and Hahndorf after going through a famous winery region, in, Alejandro Valverde, qui participe pour la première fois au Santos Tour Down Under qui a débuté hier dans la localité de Clare et se terminera le dimanche 24 janvier dans les rues de la ville australienne d'Adélaïde, a terminé la seconde étape qui reliait les villes de Gawler et Hahndorf après, avoir traversé une réputée région vinicole dan. physique au kiosque à journaux, et abonnez-vous à ceux que vous préférez. There are. allowed seperate batching of the treatments through the packing shed. It doesn't say anything about your case here, but I suspect it would be the same. Rather each funtions as "determiner", the equivalent of "many" for things that are counted (in #1 above ='many people were') and "much" for those that are not (#2 = 'it was too much trouble!'). Since you used bunch in the singular then you must use is in order to correctly correspond. Cet exemple ne correspond à la traduction ci-dessus. Can someone translate this hindi note into english? publicly referred to the author and, M. Thorup a qualifié publiquement l'auteur et. ("A bunch of " CAN, but only if used in a different sense... see below.) First -- and this is MOST of the time -- in cases where you can use "bunches of" for "a bunch of" or "lots of" in place of "a lot of" -- and mean EXACTLY the same thing -- the rule above does NOT apply. Actually, the group of bananas commonly referred to as a "bunch" at the store is actually a "hand", or less commonly "tier". qu'il vous faut participer à l'entretien de l'équipement sanitaire. Sanders sounds alarm on Trump 'nightmare scenario', Uncle Ben's rice unveils new name amid controversy, 'If you guys only knew': Reality star talks divorce, Johnson & Johnson vaccine enters crucial testing phase, Coach 'not angry' at doctor in Tyrod Taylor fiasco. Technically "is", as it refers to a single bunch, despite the number in that bunch. Cet exemple ne correspond pas à l'entrée en orange. BUT - if you wrote it in an essay or document it is wrong use of English (I know, I am a pain!!). In ALL these cases is this, the verb is singular or plural based on the noun that FOLLOWS these expressions, 1) If the main noun is something that can be COUNTED (a 'count noun') you use the plural -- "There were bunches/a bunch of people"//"Bunches/A bunch of people were...", 2) If the main noun is a NON-count noun, use the singular -- "It was a lots/a lot of trouble", "Lot(s)" and "bunch(es)" in these expressions are NOT functioning like ordinary nouns. Nous avons acheté beaucoup de pommes pour faire un gros gâteau. people who're going to end up on the dole. the door indicates that the wine tavern is open for business. Which French pronoun do I use to replace "ce week-end" in this sentence. En savoir plus. That is NOT a substitute for "much/many" but functions as an ordinary noun. Both versions are generally accepted. the "be" is on the 'bunch' so i think "is" is more correct, but i've seen "are" is more widely used. of stars in the peloton, they have worked hard for their team-mates today, Kim for the sprinters and the Schleck bros for Fabian Cancellara, who is still in the golden jersey after three days. work page) and keep an eye out for help-wanted signs. I agree though, It should be There are many people. Now there ARE some instances where "a bunch of" and "bunches of" ARE used in the same sense as "group(s)" (something which is not true for "a lot of"/"lots of"). Ce résultat ne correspond pas à ma recherche.